
Eef’s second Dressage show season is going well. In May, at Dressage at the Sandhills in Pinehurst, NC, Nancy and Eef rode 1st 1, 1st 1, 1st 2, and 1st 3 and scored 66% (5th), 65.33% (7th), 63.611% (2nd) and 69.714% (2nd) respectively. This July, his performance at Dressage at Lexington was solid as well. Nancy competed Eef for two days and four tests. Eef was a little inactive the first day for 1st 1, yet scored 64% placing 6th. Later on in the first day, Eef was tense and spooked briefly triggering a rider error during 1st 4, scoring 60% and placing 7th. It was a tough day emotionally for us since this was Eef’s first “bad day” and he had been previously so consistent during the 2006 season. Looking back to the last show of the 2006 season, Eef had ridden 1st level for the first time at the VADA Fall Competition scoring 74.444% and placing 1st.
Complicating the matter (in my not so humble opinion) was judging. At Dressage at Lexington this month, for Eef’s first day, both tests were judged by the same person. Before Nancy and Eef entered the ring, the judge blurted out to her scribe, loud enough for everyone nearby to hear, “That’s the smallest Friesian I’ve ever seen! Is that a pony Friesian?!?” I believe she meant no offense but to me it clearly indicated that the judge was not entirely comfortable with Friesians in the Dressage show ring. And in Dressage, judging is quite subjective. Much discussion among folks in the sport of Dressage is breed prejudice and it’s something that the USDF and USEF work actively to mitigate. But it remains a notable problem in my opinion. Much more improvement is needed. The second ride on the first day with this judge, the ride that earned a 60% placing Nancy and Eef 7th was not a bad ride. In my opinion, it was not a 70% ride but it was certainly not a 60% ride. I videotape every ride and we research ridden tests afterwards. The 60% is a harsh judging. Furthermore, I watched the ride prior to Nancy and Eef’s 60% ride. The horse was a large Holsteiner that was quite nice and the rider was, like Nancy, a professional rider. This particular judge had a voice that projected so I was fortunate enough to enjoy the ride and listen to the judge stating notes and associated scores for each sequence of the test. The judge would note resistance and being strung out, something that I myself saw clearly with my own eyes. The resistance during certain movements was quite plain, yet for those sequences, the judge would clearly state “slightly strung out” and then state “Seven” (the score) for the movement. Later, during Nancy and Eef’s ride, a good many of the same comments were being made. To me, even though Eef showed markedly less resistance during certain movements… where the judge gave the Holsteiner a “Seven”, here the judge would state “Six”. In fact, if memory serves, very nearly every movement that Eef the Friesian made was judged to be 1 point lower than the Holsteiner. Now, to be fair, some of those higher scores for the Holsteiner were merited. But I’d make the case that plenty were not. So, while I came away from the first day of the show knowing that every great horse has a bad day, I did leave the grounds regretting that both rides were under the same judge. I would have preferred a different judge for each ride; because diversity of judges is the only way to accurately and reliably assess a horse’s training development.
The second day of this month’s Dressage at Lexington came off much better. Nancy and Eef rode two tests under two different judges. The first ride was 1st 3 and they scored 67.143% (1st). The second ride was 1st 2 and they scored 68.889% (1st). It was a great relief to both the trainer and the trainer’s husband 